Authors Yuet-Hang Lam
Compilation date 06 May 2025
Customer Swale Borough Council
Approved by Ben Davies
Copyright Ricardo Energy & Environment
EULA http://ee.ricardo.com/cms/eula/

Contract reference ED14107 Report reference Summary Report Issue 1

Executive Summary

Swale Borough Council commissioned Ricardo to conduct a particulate matter (PM) monitoring survey within the Air Quality Management Area (AQMA), originally designated for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). With consistent NO2 compliance recorded over the past five years, the study aimed to determine whether there are potential PM exceedances which may require an AQMA to stay in place.

Monitoring was undertaken at Swale Teynham from 12th March 2024 to 31st March 2025 using a low-cost Praxis/Cube sensor, supported by data from three reference stations: Swale Newington 4, Swale St Pauls Street, and Swale Ospringe Roadside 2. While the Cube is not reference-equivalent, but is currently undergoing MCERTS certification for indicative particulate matter measurements. Data underwent rigorous QA/QC procedures, including co-location and calibration, and can be considered close to indicative. There was a data gap between 25th July and 1st October 2024 due to a sensor failure, therefore, the monitoring period was extended from 31st December 2024 to 31st March 2025.

The 2024 dataset, which is considered more representative of annual trends due to its broader coverage of the year, showed that PM10 and PM2.5 periodic means at Swale Teynham were below the UK annual mean air quality objectives. The annualised 2024 annual means for PM10 (14.39 µg/m3), PM2.5 (6.92 µg/m3), and NO2 (23.30 µg/m3) all remain well below their respective UK objective. There were six 24-hour PM10 exceedances, which is well within the permitted limit of 35. The 90.4 percentile for 24-hour PM10 is 23 μg m-3, which is less than 50 μg m-3.

In early 2025, PM10 and PM2.5 periodic means at Swale Teynham were still below the UK annual mean air quality objectives. However, PM10 concentrations increased, with the 90.4 percentile (65.9 µg/m3) exceeding the suggested value. However, time variation plots reveal this was part of a broader regional trend affecting all reference sites during February and March 2025, indicating seasonal or meteorological influence rather than a persistent local issue. Given that only three months of 2025 data were available, these exceedances do not reliably reflect annual performance.

Swale Teynham had lower median and quartile PM concentrations than the reference sites over the monitoring period, with less pronounced diurnal pattern. Polar plots suggest a combination of local and distant PM10 sources, particularly under specific wind conditions.

The study concludes that there is no strong evidence to suggest PM exceedances at Swale Teynham that would necessitate the continuation of the AQMA. The use of low-cost sensors with a comprehensive QA/QC process has proven effective for local air quality assessment. Continued monitoring is recommended to further assess potential emission sources and support future air quality management decisions.

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose

Swale Borough Council has commissioned Ricardo to complete a Particulate Matter (PM) monitoring survey within an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) designated for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). The AQMA has illustrated compliance for NO2 for five years and is being considered for revocation. This study aims to assess whether there are potential PM exceedances which may require an AQMA to stay in place, despite the reduction in NO2. Although the primary focus of this study is PM measurements, NO2 has also been measured and reported.

This summary report analyses the results of air quality sensor monitoring at Swale Teynham measured by Swale Borough Council for the period 12th March 2024 to 31st March 2025 (extended from 31st December 2024). It is also compared with three reference stations located at Swale Newington 4, Swale St Pauls Street, and Swale Ospringe Roadside 2. Note that there is a data gap between 25th July and 1st October 2024 due to a sensor fault. An alternative sensor unit replaced the original sensor and the monitoring period was extended for an additional quarter to the 31st March 2025.

Kent’s local authorities have been using air quality sensors to improve local air quality. This kind of sensor is rapidly developing to provide relatively lower cost for air quality monitoring. It can determine the pollution levels in near real-time for better air quality management. The automatic air quality monitoring stations can provide higher certainty reference data to evaluate the compliance of air quality standards and objectives.

1.2 Monitoring methods and QA/QC

1.2.1 Low-Cost Praxis/Cube Sensor

The Praxis/Cube sensor has the ability to measure a number of key pollutants. In this study, the pollutants measured were PM10, PM2.5 and NO2. The sensor uses an optical particle counter to measure particulate matter concentrations as well as measuring NO2 concentrations using an electrochemical sensor. Pollutants are continuously measured and averages are aggregated at one minute intervals. These data are then downloaded hourly by Ricardo. The Praxis/Cube sensor is not a reference equivalent monitor but is currently undergoing MCERTS certification for indicative particulate matter measurements. Following Ricardo’s QA/QC validation processes, the data are close to indicative classification and therefore data measured by the Praxis/Cube sensor are useful in assessment against air quality objectives and in studies such as this.

1.2.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)

The data presented in this report are managed by Ricardo and stored in a dedicated, secure database. The data are also provisional and subject to change following further extensive QA/QC upon the completion of the sampling period.

Data from automatic monitoring stations undergo the same QA/QC procedures as those carried out on Defra’s Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN). Data are ratified in discrete time blocks, following the schedule of audits and calibrations. Following this comprehensive QA/QC process, data will be marked as ratified. All data provided in this report are currently marked as provisional.

QA/QC practices were applied to the data measured by the low-cost Praxis/Cube sensor used in this study in line with advice published by Air Quality Expert Group (AQEG) on the Defra UK air website (AQEG advice on the use of ‘low-cost’ pollution sensors - Defra, UK). Practices carried out as part of the QA/QC process include co-location of the sensor with reference stations and calculation and application of correction factors derived from the data collected during these co-locations. To calculate the correction factor for each pollutant measured by each sensor, orthogonal regression analysis is carried out where correlation between the sensor and reference site is shown. The first sensor was co-located with the London Harlington AQMS at the start of the the monitoring period, between 12th February and 28th February 2024. The second sensor was co-located with Swale St Paul’s Street between 12th September and 26th September 2024, while the first sensor experienced a fault.

1.3 Dynamic Reporting

This is a dynamic report which contains the data it displays embedded within and allows the reader a level of interaction with some of the findings. This enables a more easily navigated and streamlined report with a more engaging, intuitive reader experience.

Maps, tables and some plots have an element of interactivity to them which makes them easier to read or offers additional insight. Maps for example can be panned and zoomed with different layers and markers turned on and off and with popup information by clicking on markers or hovering the mouse over them. Tables may contain much more information than initially displayed and can be set to show different numbers of rows, and can be filtered, sorted, or searched to display only specific information of interest. Some time series plots can be tracked with the mouse cursor to obtain specific time/date stamps and values and the reader can zoom into a specific time window by dragging with the cursor and double left clicking to return to the full plot extent.

The report is easily navigable using the floating table of contents on the left pane which tracks with the reader’s progress through the report and expands and collapses to a level of detail related to the subheadings used. The layout of the report is also dynamic, with some sections split into specific ‘tabs’ (e.g. per pollutant or per site) for ease of access to those sections.

2 Monitoring stations

A summary of site information is presented in the interactive map and table below. The pink circles on the map represent the 3 reference stations. Green circle represent the locations of the AQ sensor unit at Swale Teynham. Further information on the monitoring sites can be obtained by clicking on the site markers on the map.

The Swale Teynham AQ sensor data was publicly available on the KentAir website under the Swale Teynham site page.

Figure 1: Location of monitoring sites.



Below is a site photo showing the location where the sensor unit is installed at Swale Teynham. The sensor is indicated by a red circle in the picture.

3 Data description

Data contained within this report is managed by Ricardo and stored in a dedicated, secure database.

Some of the plots provided in this report use associated meteorological data (typically wind speed and wind direction) in order to show measured pollutant concentrations in a dispersion context. Very few monitoring stations provide quality controlled met data, therefore these reports import nearest meteorological data from the The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Integrated Surface Database (ISD) surface meteorological observations

All gaseous pollutant mass units are at 20C and 1013mb. Particulate matter concentrations are reported at ambient temperature and pressure. NOx mass units are NOx as NO2 μg m-3.

3.1 Relevant pollution Limit Values

The European Air Quality Directive and Fourth Daughter Directive set out legal limits for different pollutants as Limit Values, Target Values or Long Term Objectives to protect human health. With the UK’s exit from the EU the UK’s Air Quality Strategy (AQS) is no longer tied to that of the EU, however the current objectives are at least as stringent as the EC limit values.

The UK AQS limits related to this project are summarised in the table below. All pollutants measured have been included in this data summary for completeness, irrespective of their significance for local authority policy interests.

3.2 Daily Air Quality Index (DAQI)

The Daily Air Quality Index (DAQI) provides information on air pollution levels, recommended actions, and health advice. The index is numbered 1-10 and divided into four bands, low (1) to very high (10). More information on the AQ Index can be found on the Defra UK AIR website.

Boundaries

Band DAQI 1-hour NO2 (μgm-3) 24-hour PM2.5 (μgm-3) 24-hour PM10 (μgm-3)
Low 1 0-67 0-11 0-16
2 68-134 12-23 17-33
3 135-200 24-35 34-50
Moderate 4 201-267 36-41 51-58
5 268-334 42-47 59-66
6 335-400 48-53 67-75
High 7 401-467 54-58 76-83
8 468-534 59-64 84-91
9 535-600 65-70 92-100
Very High 10 601 or more 71 or more 101 or more

Health Effects

AP Band Accompanying health messages for at-risk individuals Accompanying health messages for the general population
Low (1-3) Enjoy your usual outdoor activities. Enjoy your usual outdoor activities.
Moderate (4-6) Adults and children with lung problems, and adults with heart problems, who experience symptoms, should consider reducing strenuous physical activity, particularly outdoors. Enjoy your usual outdoor activities.
High (7-9) Adults and children with lung problems, and adults with heart problems, should reduce strenuous physical exertion, particularly outdoors, and particularly if they experience symptoms. People with asthma may find they need to use their reliever inhaler more often. Older people should also reduce physical exertion. Anyone experiencing discomfort such as sore eyes, cough or sore throat should consider reducing activity, particularly outdoors.
Very High (10) Adults and children with lung problems, adults with heart problems, and older people, should avoid strenuous physical activity. People with asthma may find they need to use their reliever inhaler more often. Reduce physical exertion, particularly outdoors, especially if you experience symptoms such as cough or sore throat.

4 Data Analysis

4.1 Summary statistics

The following tables present some basic pollutant statistics for the period selected in the report. The Low, Moderate and High indicates the percentage of times when pollution concentrations are in the DAQI bands described above. Comparisons have been made with the UK Objectives as well. The Praxis/Cube sensor is not a reference equivalent monitor but it is certified as indicative for particulate matter measurements. Although it does not have indicative certification for gaseous measurements. However, these results are still useful in assessment against air quality objectives and in studies such as this.

In 2024, the periodic means measured by the Swale Teynham sensor for PM and NO2 are below the annual mean stated in the UK objectives. For PM10, there were 6 exceedances of 24-hour UK objectives, but this is still within the allowance of exceedances (35 times). The 90.4 percentile for 24-hour PM10 is 23 μg m-3, which is less than 50 μg m-3.

In 2025, the periodic means measured by the Swale Teynham sensor for PM and NO2 are still below the annual mean stated in the UK objectives. For PM10, there were 19 exceedances of 24-hour UK objectives, but this is still within the allowance of exceedances as well. The 90.4 percentile for 24-hour PM10 is 65.9 μg m-3, which is over 50 μg m-3. It is likely that PM10 episodes occurred between January and March 2025. To evaluate the variation of air pollutant concentrations across different months, time variation plots are recommended. As only three months of data are available for 2025, this dataset is insufficient to capture full annual variation. Therefore, the 2024 results are considered more representative of typical annual conditions.

There were no exceedances for NO2. For PM2.5 24-hour average, it is not stated in the UK objectives, so no comparison was made.

To estimate the annual mean for Swale Teynham, annualisation is performed. The estimated annual means for Swale Teynham still comply with the UK objectives for all pollutants. The details of the calculation are provided below.

PM10


To estimate the annual mean for Swale Teynham, annualisation is performed. The annualisation factor Ra for 2024 dataset is calculated by averaging all these ratios of the annual mean to the period mean (A/P) from the surrounding reference sites.


Based on the results above, the annualisation factor for PM10 in Swale Teynham is 1.003. The best estimate of the 2024 annual mean for Swale Teynham is 14.39 μg m-3, which is well below the annual mean limit specified in the UK objectives.

PM2.5


To estimate the annual mean for Swale Teynham, annualisation is performed. The annualisation factor Ra for 2024 dataset is calculated by averaging all these ratios of the annual mean to the period mean (A/P) from the surrounding reference sites.


Based on the results above, the annualisation factor for PM2.5 in Swale Teynham is 1.063. The best estimate of the 2024 annual mean for Swale Teynham is 6.92 μg m-3, which is well below the annual mean specified in the UK objectives.

NO2


To estimate the annual mean for Swale Teynham, annualisation is performed. The annualisation factor Ra for 2024 dataset is calculated by averaging all these ratios of the annual mean to the period mean (A/P) from the surrounding reference sites.


Based on the results above, the annualisation factor for NO2 in Swale Teynham is 1.031. The best estimate of the 2024 annual mean for Swale Teynham is 23.3 μg m-3, which is well below the annual mean specified in the UK objectives.

4.2 Time series plot

The plots below show the time series of concentrations each hour. Each pollutant is presented on a different tab and all sites are shown on each plot for comparison. Both PM plots include a rolling 24-hour average plot with shading by the range of DAQI index, and an hourly average plot as a reference. The NO2 plot includes only an hourly average plot, also shaded by the range of DAQI index.

The plot is interactive and you can change what is shown by the following:

  • Clicking on the “Current month” button shows the data for the reporting period. All data since the sensor installed can be seen by clicking on the “All” button.
  • Zooming in on specific periods can be done by dragging a box over the section of the main plot.
  • Holding the mouse over the lines will highlight specific values and time stamp for that record for each site.
  • Double-clicking on a site in the legend will show the time series for the selected site.
  • To return to the default (all data), double click the plot.

PM10

Rolling 24-hour average

Figure 2: Time series plot of rolling 24-hour average PM10 concentration.

Hourly average

Figure 3: Time series plot of hourly average PM10 concentration.

PM2.5

Rolling 24-hour average

Figure 4: Time series plot of rolling 24-hour average PM2.5 concentration.

Hourly average

Figure 5: Time series plot of hourly average PM2.5 concentration.

NO2

Hourly average

Figure 6: Time series plot of hourly average NO2 concentration.

4.3 AQ index distribution

The plots below illustrate the distribution of AQ index values for each site by pollutant. It shows the number of occasions (hours) that each site reported concentrations are in each index. More information on the AQ Index is available from UK-Air. Note that this summary presents data at hourly resolution which differs from Defra’s Daily AQ Index (DAQI) which takes the worst across all pollutants and hours to represent each day.

PM10

Figure 7: Distribution of AQI for PM10.

PM2.5

Figure 8: Distribution of AQI for PM2.5.

NO2

Figure 9: Distribution of AQI for NO2.

4.4 Boxplots

The plots below are box and whisker plots to show the distribution in concentrations for each monitoring station. The boxes demarcate the lower quartile, median and upper quartile. The whiskers extend to the maximum and minimum values within median ± 1.5 times interquartile range (IQR). Values outside the median ± 1.5 times IQR are generally considered as outliers.

Swale Teynham has lower median and quartile values in PM10 and PM2.5, compared to the other two locations. The outliers are more contained, without extreme high values as seen at the other two sites.

PM10

Figure 10: Boxplot for daily PM10 concentrations.

PM2.5

Figure 11: Boxplot for daily PM2.5 concentrations.

NO2

Figure 12: Boxplot for hourly NO2 concentrations.

4.5 Time Variation plot

These plots show concentrations over different time intervals such as diurnal, day of week and month of year. The plot showing seasonal variation will show the months from the sensor installed to the month covered in this report. The topmost frame shows the concentrations as they vary by hour of the day and day of the week. The hour of the day variation is summarised on its own in the lower left pane and the variation by day of the week is shown in the lower right pane. These plots often help explain variations in concentration according to the emissions activity associated with them. For example, NOx concentrations at roadside sites tend to exhibit peaks according to morning and evening traffic rush hours and tend to decline over weekends when there is generally lower traffic volumes.

Swale Teynham shows lower PM concentrations and less pronounced diurnal patterns compared to the other two sites. The monthly averages are generally lower as well, although PM10 levels increase between October and December, reaching or even exceeding those observed at Swale Newington 4. This increase may be related to domestic burning or other seasonal activities. Swale Teynham recorded higher PM10 concentrations between January and March compared to Swale Newington 4. However, other monitoring sites also experienced elevated PM10 concentrations during February and March, suggesting that seasonal factors may have contributed to the observed increase across locations.

For NO2, the diurnal patterns are similar across the four sites. Swale Teynham’s diurnal concentrations fall approximately in the middle range relative to the others. However, its monthly averages drop slightly from November to December, making it the site with the lowest NO2 concentrations during those months.

PM10

Figure 13: Time variation of hourly PM10 concentrations.

PM2.5

Figure 14: Time variation of hourly PM2.5 concentrations.

NO2

Figure 15: Time variation of hourly NO2 concentrations.

4.6 Calendar plot

The plots below show daily variation in concentrations by pollutant and site (one on each tab) across the period of the report, as laid out in a calendar style. This allows intuitive viewing of day to day headline trends in the wider context of the period. The background colours shown for each day relate to the concentration. The actual concentrations, along with the wind speed, can also be seen by hovering the mouse on the cell.

PM10

Swale Teynham (Sensor)

Figure 16: PM10 calendar plot: Swale Teynham.

Swale Newington 4 (Reference)

Figure 17: PM10 calendar plot: Swale Newington 4.

Swale Ospringe Roadside 2 (Reference)

NULL

Swale St Pauls Street (Reference)

Figure 19: PM10 calendar plot: Swale St Pauls Street.

PM2.5

Swale Teynham (Sensor)

Figure 20: PM2.5 calendar plot: Swale Teynham.

Swale Newington 4 (Reference)

Figure 21: PM2.5 calendar plot: Swale Newington 4.

Swale Ospringe Roadside 2 (Reference)

NULL

Swale St Pauls Street (Reference)

Figure 23: PM2.5 calendar plot: Swale St Pauls Street.

NO2

Swale Teynham (Sensor)

Figure 24: NO2 calendar plot: Swale Teynham.

Swale Newington 4 (Reference)

Figure 25: NO2 calendar plot: Swale Newington 4.

Swale Ospringe Roadside 2 (Reference)

Figure 26: NO2 calendar plot: Swale Ospringe Roadside 2.

Swale St Pauls Street (Reference)

Figure 27: NO2 calendar plot: Swale St Pauls Street.

4.7 Polar plot map

The map shows polar plots for each pollutant at each monitoring station. The bivariate polar plots determine how the concentrations are varied by wind speed and wind direction.The distance from the plot origin shows the wind speed. The concentration of the pollutant is shown by different colour scale by the concentration range of that station. To look into a specific site, pan and zoom into areas of interest to get greater detail.

Swale Teynham shows that there are likely local emission sources, as PM and NO2 exhibit higher concentrations when wind speeds are lowest or medium wind speeds from northeast. PM10 also shows a high concentration when wind speeds are highest from the southwest. This pattern is not observed for PM2.5 and NO2, suggesting that the canyon effect is unlikely. It is possible that a distant source from that direction is contributing to the PM10 levels in Swale Teynham when the wind speed is very high.

PM10

Figure 28: Polar plot map of hourly PM10 concentrations.

PM2.5

Figure 29: Polar plot map of hourly PM2.5 concentrations.

NO2

Figure 30: Polar plot map of hourly NO2 concentrations.

4.8 Back trajectory analysis

The back trajectory plot shows data from the HYSPLIT model (NOAA HYSPLIT) run in analysis mode. This shows the 72-hour air mass back trajectories for the period covered by the report. Two different kinds of plot are shown. One statistically groups the trajectories into similar clusters and shows the proportion of time during the report period that each represents. This is useful to get an overview of air mass origins during the report period. A plot of the trajectories associated with the top 10 measured concentrations is also presented.

Trajectory clusters

Figure 31: Trajectory plot for 72-hour air mass back trajectories for the reporting period grouped into 5 clusters.

Air mass back trajectories over these spatial scales do not vary locally so the receptor location used in this report has been selected from a range of national receptor locations maintained by Ricardo Energy & Environment. The receptor point is used here is London Bridge Place.

Trajectories associated with top ten most polluted days

The average daily concentration for each pollutant across all the sites is calculated, with the top 10 most polluted days identified and linked to its back trajectory data in the plot below.

PM10

Figure 32: Trajectory plot for top ten highest daily PM10 concentrations.

PM2.5

Figure 33: Trajectory plot for top ten highest daily PM2.5 concentrations.

NO2

Figure 34: Trajectory plot for top ten highest daily NO2 concentrations.

5 Conclusions and recommendations

This monitoring study, commissioned by Swale Borough Council, has provided valuable insights into the air quality within the designated AQMA at Swale Teynham. The data from the monitoring period, coupled with comparisons to reference stations, indicate that PM10 and PM2.5 are generally remain below UK air quality objectives, with no exceedances of the 90.4 percentile of the 24-hour PM10 objective in 2024. Although it exceeds the 90.4 percentile limit in 2025, time variation plots indicate that all monitoring sites experienced elevated PM10 concentrations during February and March. This suggests that the three-month dataset is not sufficient to represent annual performance in 2025. While PM10 concentrations show occasional exceedances of 24-hour limits, these remain within the overall allowable limits during the project period. Furthermore, the study has revealed that Swale Teynham has lower median and quartile values in PM10 and PM2.5, compared to other monitored sites, suggesting relatively better PM level in this area. However, besides of local emission sources, potential distant PM10 sources have been identified.

Overall, this study shows that it is unlikely there will be potential PM exceedances requiring an AQMA to remain in place. It also demonstrates the value of using low-cost sensors with a comprehensive QA/QC process to improve local air quality. To continue improving local air quality, ongoing monitoring is essential to further assess potential emission sources and inform future air quality management decisions.



For further information, please contact:

Name Ben Davies
Address Ricardo Energy & Environment, Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom
Telephone +44 1235 753069
Email